RobLib's Blog

AI Will Raise the Bar for Programmers

8 min read

There's a common misconception floating around, especially among non-technical people: AI will replace programmers because it can generate code. You can ask ChatGPT to "create a todo app," and boom, you get working code. So why would we need developers in the future, right?

This couldn't be further from the truth. In fact, I believe AI will have the opposite effect, it will demand that future programmers understand things more deeply, not less. Let me explain why.

The Difference Between Coders and Developers

First, we need to distinguish between two types of people working with code:

Here's the crucial insight: The first group is indeed at risk. If your job is purely mechanical code production, AI can already do that better and faster. But for the second group, real developers, AI is not a threat. It's a powerful accelerator.

The Todo App Illusion

When someone sees AI generate a todo app perfectly, they think programming is solved. But this reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of what software development actually is.

A simple example application is not a real-world application. Real projects have:

AI can generate a todo app. But can it design a scalable architecture for a system with millions of users? Can it make informed decisions about database optimization under heavy load? Can it translate vague business requirements into working software? Can it balance technical debt against delivery pressure?

No. These require deep understanding, experience, and judgment that AI doesn't possess.

The Rising Bar of Expectations

Here's something interesting: as technology advances, our standards keep rising. Twenty years ago, a website that loaded in 5 seconds was fine. Today, users expect sub-second load times. We expect perfect mobile responsiveness, accessibility compliance, security by default, and seamless user experiences.

"The bar for what constitutes 'good software' keeps rising, and AI just raises it further."

AI might make it easier to write initial code, but client expectations and project complexity are growing faster than AI capabilities. The gap between "works on my machine" and "production-ready system" is actually widening, not shrinking.

Liberation from the Mundane

This is actually good news for developers who embrace learning. AI handling the mechanical parts of programming frees us to focus on what actually matters:

In the past, we spent 80% of our time writing boilerplate code and 20% thinking about architecture. AI can flip that ratio. Now we can spend 80% of our time on the hard problems that actually deliver value.

AI as an Accelerated Learning Tool

There's another crucial aspect: AI doesn't just help you code faster, it helps you learn faster. When you're working with a new technology, AI can explain concepts, show examples, and help you understand patterns quickly.

For developers committed to continuous learning, this is transformative. You can dive deeper into topics, explore more technologies, and build a broader and deeper understanding than was previously possible. The limiting factor is no longer access to information, it's your willingness to learn.

But This Requires Active Learning

Here's the critical point: you can't just copy-paste AI-generated code without understanding it. If you do, you're basically a glorified code executor, and yes, that role will disappear.

But if you use AI as a tool to understand why code works the way it does, to explore different approaches, to learn new patterns, then you're actually deepening your expertise, not replacing it.

Higher Standards for Future Developers

This brings me to my main thesis: future programmers will need to understand things more deeply, not less.

When coding becomes easier, the competitive advantage shifts to understanding:

The developers who thrive in an AI-enabled world won't be those who write the most code, they'll be those who make the best decisions about what code to write and how to structure it.

The Accountability Factor: Why Clients Need Humans

There's another crucial aspect that often gets overlooked in discussions about AI replacing developers: accountability and responsibility.

When clients hire a development team or a software company, they're not just buying code. They're delegating responsibility for a critical business function because they don't want to, or can't, handle it themselves. They need:

AI cannot provide any of this. You can't sue ChatGPT when your application fails. You can't hold GitHub Copilot accountable for a security breach. You can't demand that Claude fix bugs in production at 3 AM.

"Clients aren't just buying code, they're buying accountability, responsibility, and peace of mind."

The Legal and Business Reality

From a legal and business perspective, AI will never be able to replace the human element in professional software development. Companies need:

If your role as a developer is purely to type code with zero accountability for the outcome, then yes, that position might be at risk. But if you're someone who takes ownership of projects, understands client needs, guarantees quality, and stands behind your work, AI can't replace that.

In fact, as AI handles more of the mechanical coding, the human responsibility aspect becomes even more valuable. Clients will pay premium rates for developers and teams they can trust to deliver, support, and be accountable for their systems.

The Risk of Stagnation

There is a real risk, though: developers who stop learning. If you become complacent, relying entirely on AI without understanding the underlying principles, you're making yourself obsolete.

This is similar to how calculators didn't eliminate mathematicians, they eliminated people who could only do arithmetic. The mathematicians who understood the deeper concepts became more valuable, not less.

The same will happen with programming. Those who understand computer science fundamentals, software architecture, system design, and business logic will become more valuable. Those who only knew how to type syntax will find their skills commoditized.

Practical Advice for Developers

So what should developers do to prepare for this future?

  1. Focus on fundamentals - Understand algorithms, data structures, networking, databases at a deep level
  2. Learn system design - Study how large-scale systems are architected and why
  3. Understand business - Learn to translate business needs into technical solutions
  4. Master debugging - Get good at finding and fixing problems in complex systems
  5. Practice architecture - Design systems, not just write code
  6. Communicate effectively - Learn to explain technical concepts to non-technical people
  7. Never stop learning - Explore new technologies, patterns, and approaches constantly

Most importantly: use AI as a learning tool, not a replacement for thinking. When AI generates code, understand it. Question it. Improve it. Use it as a starting point for deeper exploration, not as a final answer.

The Bottom Line

Will AI take jobs from programmers? Yes, from those who are just code writers. But for those who are true developers, problem solvers, architects, and lifelong learners, AI is not a threat. It's the most powerful tool we've ever had.

The future doesn't belong to people who can type syntax quickly. It belongs to people who understand systems deeply, who can make good architectural decisions, who can translate business needs into technical reality, and who never stop learning.

"AI won't replace developers. It will separate developers who understand their craft from those who were just typing code all along."

So no, future programmers won't understand less. They'll need to understand more, more about architecture, more about systems, more about business, more about the bigger picture. And that's exactly why this AI revolution is so exciting for those of us committed to the craft.

Related Articles